in More Search Options

Nprobe should it work?

Last post 09-02-2008 2:12 AM by ghostcorps. 21 replies.
Page 1 of 2 (22 items) 1 2 Next >
Sort Posts:
  • 09-10-2007 9:42 AM

    • menz
    • Top 200 Contributor
    • Joined on 07-30-2007
    • Posts 39
    • Points 93

    Nprobe should it work?

    Hi,

    I have been trialling scrutinizer because we want to see the packets coming in from 3750's and these are not supported

    under netflow. You can put span ports and plug a laptop into it and the Nprobe software will convert the original packets into

    netflow format. This is then sent to the Scrutinizer module on the server and you can see the application traffic etc.

    Solarwinds said that this should working using the Netflow module but I either get an error message saying that netflow traffic is seen on an unmanaged interface on the laptop (but i am monitoring all the interfaces) or it does not see any traffic.

    If the laptop is pushing netflow traffic to the netflow module I would think that it should see this and it should work.

    Anyone any knowledge on this?

    Thanks

    Sam

    • Post Points: 3
  • 09-11-2007 7:57 AM In reply to

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    If anyone said that it would definitely work, they misspoke.  It may or may not work.  It's not something we officially support, so we've never tried it in-house.  You are the first request for this feature.  If we begin to see more demand, I'll consider adding it, at which point we'll make sure it works. 

    Denny LeCompte
    Sr. Product Manager, Orion
    SolarWinds
    Austin, TX
    • Post Points: 3
  • 09-11-2007 8:06 AM In reply to

    • menz
    • Top 200 Contributor
    • Joined on 07-30-2007
    • Posts 39
    • Points 93

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    I don't know if anyone else might want it but if they knew it would work I'm sure they would.

    If it doesn't work then we will probably have to buy scrutinizer instead of the Netflow module which is

    a bit of a shame because the functionality of the netflow module is much better.

    Thanks

    Sam

    • Post Points: 3
  • 09-21-2007 8:17 AM In reply to

    • a1ex
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-25-2007
    • Posts 21
    • Points 49

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    I'd be interested in this functionality.

    I'm trying to work around having our border router as a Sonicwall rather than Cisco.

     Alternatively, you could support SW's exported log format, but I suspect that's a bit more work...
     

    • Post Points: 3
  • 09-21-2007 8:53 AM In reply to

    • darryld
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-30-2004
    • United Kingdom
    • Posts 49
    • Points 120

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    I have successfully used nprobe to collect info from a windows server and send it to NTA.

    You need to set the -u and -Q parameters to fix the index number of the input and output devices

     

    • Post Points: 3
  • 09-21-2007 10:33 AM In reply to

    • a1ex
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-25-2007
    • Posts 21
    • Points 49

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

     I'm probably being dense, but how do you set the parameters for the server?

     Any points would be helpful.
     

    • Post Points: 3
  • 09-21-2007 10:51 AM In reply to

    • darryld
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-30-2004
    • United Kingdom
    • Posts 49
    • Points 120

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    At the command prompt use nprobe /r to remove the existing service

    nprobe /c -h then provides full listing of all switches

     something like

                  nprobe /i -i 1 -n 192.168.0.1:2055 -u 1 -Q 1

    will re-install the service and send all the data from interface 1 to NTA (on 192.168.0.1 port 2055) all tagged as coming from interface index 1

    • Post Points: 1
  • 09-21-2007 10:52 AM In reply to

    • a1ex
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-25-2007
    • Posts 21
    • Points 49

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    Following on from my post, I've worked out how to set the variables, and I can see the netflow packets arriving at the collector, but it's not being picked up by Orion.

     What do I need to set -u and -q to for Orion to see the network packets?

    The monitoring box has two ethernet interfaces, one that's plugged into a span port, and the other that is used to send the flows across the network.

     


     

    • Post Points: 3
  • 09-21-2007 2:46 PM In reply to

    • darryld
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-30-2004
    • United Kingdom
    • Posts 49
    • Points 120

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    try the interface index of  either port, providing that port is being monitored by orion 

    • Post Points: 5
  • 09-22-2007 7:51 AM In reply to

    • a1ex
    • Top 500 Contributor
    • Joined on 05-25-2007
    • Posts 21
    • Points 49

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    Sorted and working beautifully. Thanks for your help. 

    • Post Points: 1
  • 10-01-2007 11:01 AM In reply to

    • menz
    • Top 200 Contributor
    • Joined on 07-30-2007
    • Posts 39
    • Points 93

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    I am still unable to get this work and I'm sure that it's the command line that I'm doing wrong.

    I have a laptop plugged in to the monitor port on the cisco 3750 and the other port connected to a normal

    port to send the traffic.

    I have found out that the laptop has interface index numbers of 0 and 8. So one is the monitor port and the

    other one is the normal port. I have tried lots of combinations of the command ie

    nprobe /i -i 1 -n 192.168.0.1:2055 -u 0 -Q 8

    nprobe /i -i 0 -n 192.168.0.1:2055 -u 8 -Q 8

     nprobe /i -i 0 -n 192.168.0.1:2055 -u 8 -Q 8

    I am guessing really as i don't know which interface index number is connected to which port on the laptop.

     If anyone has any ideas that would be great as I'm begining to lose the plot!!

    Sam

     

    • Post Points: 3
  • 10-01-2007 11:31 AM In reply to

    • darryld
    • Top 150 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-30-2004
    • United Kingdom
    • Posts 49
    • Points 120

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    If you are monitoring both interfaces on Orion then setting the -u and -Q switches to either 0 or 8 should work with either -i 0 or -i 8 depending on which is the ingress port.

    I have had a problem with running nprobe as a service on 1 or 2 machines. Try running it from the console nprobe /c, this has the advantage of a verbose mode -b 1 or -b 2 which may help with debugging

    • Post Points: 3
  • 10-03-2007 10:29 AM In reply to

    • menz
    • Top 200 Contributor
    • Joined on 07-30-2007
    • Posts 39
    • Points 93

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    I had loads of problems with this but I have finally got it working.

    Thanks

    SAM

    • Post Points: 3
  • 08-06-2008 2:26 AM In reply to

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

     I still don't quite get it.


     If none of our routers or switches have netflow, jflow or sflow then this is pointless?

     

     I started reading this thread on the context that nprobe was a soft-alternative to buying a netflow-able router. But having played with it, it looks like just another collector.

    Please tell me I missed something?

     

    I have been evaluating your products for the last week or so and am utterly in love... Or I would be if it actually analysed traffic! I hope there is a work around, because I really don't see anything else worth considering on the market.

     

    Thanks

    • Post Points: 3
  • 08-06-2008 8:33 AM In reply to

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    Ghostcorps,

    The others on this thread seem to indicate that they got it working.  Maybe on the box with Orion NetFlow module, can you use WireShark and get a sniffer trace capture?  See if there is UDP traffic coming in on the port that nprobe should be sending to.  If not, then you know that your problem isn't the Orion NetFlow module.  If the traffic is coming in, then I'd be interested in taking a look at that sniffer trace for you.

     Thanks,

    David Maltby
    NetFlow Development Lead
    SolarWinds
    • Post Points: 3
  • 08-06-2008 6:27 PM In reply to

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

     Thanks David,

     

     I will see what I can do. :)

     I apologise for not providing more details, it was late and I was getting frustrated. The thing that I am not sure about is whether or not this method will replace the need for a netflow-able router altogether. Will one instance of nprobe, properly configured, provide the flows for all the interfaces being monitored? Or will I need to run nprobe on every device being monitored?

     

    Regards

     

    [EDIT]

     I have since installed fprobe on one of the Linux interfaces and confirm that it is working correctly so far, I may recant this when I have had a chance to collect enough data. 

     I now understand that nprobe must be installed on each individual device, and that the collector is working. Now all I need is to figure out the correct nprobe flags... :s  hopefully this won't be too hard :)

     [EDIT2]

     

    "NetFlow Receiver Service [PC3] is receiving a NetFlow data stream from an unmanaged interface on 10.0.0.133. The NetFlow data stream will be discarded. Please use the Orion System Manager to add Interface #8 in order to process this NetFlow data stream."

     

    So close!   PC03 is infact 10.0.0.133, which is where Orion is installed and it is also the collector. I have added this interface again with the System Manager but it changed nothing. Where exactly do i advise Orion to accept the netflow stream from this interface?

    • Post Points: 1
  • 08-06-2008 11:02 PM In reply to

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

     Still no luck.

     

     I am at the point of trying to discover the values for  -i, -u & -Q. 

     I have tried omitting -u & Q, so that it can be allocated dynamically, but neither "-i 1" nor "-i 0" makes any change.

     I have deleted the node and re-discovered it a nubmer of times, ensuring that I have selected the interface when doing so, but the results are not changing.

     The 'Interface Details' page says that the index is 2. I tried using this for -u & -Q, but again there was no change. I now have 21 big yellow warning boxes, and am out of combinations to try.

     

    I don't suppose anyone has a method for determining these numbers other than trial and error?

     

    It would be greatly appreciated :)

    • Post Points: 3
  • 08-28-2008 9:46 PM In reply to

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

     Hello again,.

     

     I am still having trouble here.

     

     I have the full nProbe binary for win32, which I have installd as a service on the same machine as the collector with the following args:

     

      c:/Prog.../nProbe.exe -/i -n localhost:2055

     

    I use fprobe on my linux machine, which 'seems' to work, so I assume the collector is working.  Can anyone suggest a working configuration for the nProbe service?

     

    Thanks

     

    =^_^=

    • Post Points: 1
  • 08-29-2008 5:31 AM In reply to

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

    did you try nprobe /c  -h?

    At the end you get the available interfaces with the index 

    • Post Points: 3
  • 08-31-2008 6:00 PM In reply to

    Re: Nprobe should it work?

     Thanks :)

     

      It looks like it is working:

     

    C:\Program Files\nProbe-Win32>nprobe /c -h
    Running nProbe for Win32.

    ~

    Available interfaces:
            [index=0] 'Adapter for generic dialup and VPN capture'
            [index=1] 'Attansic AtcL001 Gigabit Ethernet Controller'

    ...


    C:\Program Files\nProbe-Win32>nprobe /c -i 1 -n 10.0.0.133:2055
    Running nProbe for Win32.
    01/Sep/2008 08:45:14 [dbPlugin.c:65] Initializing DB plugin
    01/Sep/2008 08:45:14 [nprobe.c:3858] Capturing packets from interface \Device\NP
    F_{14CE400A-4AB7-47C4-AAD7-5440FB2E6DA6}


    However when I point the Netflow Realtime application at this IP, it captures the traffic speed, but when I select 'Start Flow Capture' I receive the warning 'NetFlow is not detected on the selected interface (see attached image)

     

     It looks like nProbe is running, but not generating any captures. Are they stored locally anywhere that I can confirm it is recording somethgin at all?

     

     

    Thanks for your help :)

     

     

     

     


    • Post Points: 3
Page 1 of 2 (22 items) 1 2 Next >